THE GLOBAL WAR AGAINST TRUTH

Few things provide a better example of the war against truth, than U.N. efforts at controlling speech globally through "blasphemy" laws, as championed by Hillary Clinton and arbitrated by Islamic nation States who impose the death penalty for it, as detailed on the prior page at this link.

2Thessalonians 2:10 And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. 11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: 12 That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.

Virtually every country in the world is under siege, in a global war against truth by the father of lies, through a campaign against speech by Muhammad's followers and their politically correct western dhimmis. Islamic conquest is advanced through the snake oil of false victimhood, in the Islamized media's fight against truth, through the self-censorship of Sharia directed "civilization jihad" in the ongoing Muslim Brotherhoo d led Islamic conquest of the United States and the rest of the world.

The uneducated sheepishly submit to charges of "insulting our prophet" that are leveled in efforts to close conversations, in which the truth about Muhammad becomes increasingly apparent, even through Islam's own books. Muhammad's followers whine about "insulting" Muhammad, even as they outright blaspheme the Son of God, with impunity.

John 8:44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.

So it would seem there is little point in asking Muhammad's faithful, what kind of lying is permissible in Islam, since the person responding is allowed by their god to lie in the answer they give you. Typically Muhammad's followers will say that lying is only allowed if one's life is at stake, which is cowardly enough, in comparison to what is expected of Christians:

Indeed many Christians are martyred by Muslims, all around the world today, for refusing to deny Jesus Christ when it is demanded of them by Muhammad's followers. Just as Yahweh's people were martyred by Muhammad and his followers in the 7th century:

Tabari VIII:35/Ishaq:464 "The Jews were made to come down, and Allah's Messenger imprisoned them. Then the Prophet went out into the marketplace of Medina (it is still its marketplace today), and he had trenches dug in it. He sent for the Jewish men and had them beheaded in those trenches. They were brought out to him in batches. They numbered 800 to 900 boys and men."

Tabari VIII:35/Ishaq:464 "Huyayy, the enemy of Allah, was brought out..... When he looked at Muhammad he said, 'I do not regret opposing you. Whoever forsakes God will be damned.' He sat down and was beheaded."

Once lying is sanctioned, by what someone has been taught to believe is God, lying becomes a very relative thing. When asked about it, the answers Muhammad's followers offer will be dissimulation right within the answer that is filled with half truths, omissions and obfuscation.

Taqiyya according to Sunni Muslim theologian Abu Ha-med Mohammad ibn Mohammad al-Ghazzali, one of the most highly regarded figures in the history of Islamic jurisprudence who ".....has been referred to by some historians as the single most influential Muslim after the Islamic prophet Muhammad.":

“Speaking is a means to achieve objectives. If a praiseworthy aim is attainable through both telling the truth and lying, it is unlawful to accomplish it through lying because there is no need for it. When it is possible to achieve such an aim by lying but not by telling the truth, it is permissible to lie if attaining the goal is permissible..., and obligatory to lie if the goal is obligatory. ...One should compare the bad consequences entailed by lying to those entailed by telling the truth, and if the consequences of telling the truth are more damaging, one is entitled to lie…”

Da'wah is proselytizing for the Islamic faith, so when it is not possible to achieve this goal by telling the truth (in an interfaith dialogue for example), Muslims are under obligation to lie while proselytizing.

An example of lying in "Allah's" cause would be when a Muslim claims Islam is a "religion of peace", while recognizing that is contrary to 1400 years of Islamic history, objective reality, and what is taught in major Islamic universities. Another would be when a Muslim wittingly (or unwittingly through abject ignorance) parrots the preposterously false denial that "Islam is not antichrist". Or when a Muslim advances Islamic so-called "tradition" regarding a history of Mecca prior to the 4th century AD, when there is not a shred of historical or archaeological evidence that supports Islam's unhistorical, counter-scriptural, geographically and demographically impossible "tradition".

It isn't unusual for Muhammad's followers to pretend friendship with non-Muslims toward the objective of "da'wah", however actual friendship is prohibited, except perhaps to achieve an Islamic goal. Indeed friendship with Jews and Christians is so prohibited Muhammad informs his people that if they make friends with Christians or Jews they become OF us:

Surah 5:51 O ye who believe! take not the Jews and the Christians for your friends and protectors: They are but friends and protectors to each other. And he amongst you that turns to them (for friendship) is of them. Verily Allah guideth not a people unjust.

Not much can be worse than for a follower of Muhammad to be OF Christians, since they must presume that each and every Christian throughout a period of nearly 2,000 years has lived and died in a state of committing Muhammad's only unforgivable sin of "shirk", for recognizing that Jesus is the Son of God and praying in Jesus' name.

"Rasul Allah (sal Allahu alaihi wa sallam) said: “He who settles disagreements between people to bring about good or says something commendable is not a liar.” Umm Kulthum (radi Allahu anha) added: “I did not hear him permit untruth in anything people say, except for three things: war, settling disagreements, and a man talking with his wife or she with him (in smoothing over differences.)” [Sahih Muslim]"

Which pretty much covers everything. Like lying to "settle disagreements" with non-Muslims to advance Dawah. It's also important to understand that Islam has been at war against the non-Islamic world for nearly 1400 years:

Ishaq:204/ Tabari VI:134 "'Men of the Khazraj, do you know what you are pledging yourselves to in swearing allegiance to this man.' 'Yes,' they answered. 'In swearing allegiance to him we are pledging ourselves to wage war against all mankind.'"

An example of Islamic dissimulation on the Internet and in YouTube videos are the many, many, Muslims who try to sell the notion that the ancient Hebrew word "Baca" suggests the modern Arabic word for "Mecca". This taqiyyah is pitched in places like increasingly Islamized Wikipedia, and countless Internet sites and YouTube videos, by censoring out the only germane portion of Psalms 84 that positively identifies the location of the pilgrimage referenced, as being "in Zion".

The most stunningly absurd part about this ridiculously transparent and easily exposed lie is that in order to suggest the pilgrimage referenced was to Mecca, would suggest that Yahweh's people turned their back on their temple Yahweh had them build on the temple mount in the Holy Land of the prophets and patriarchs, to wander 1200 KM across harsh, barren, unexplored, uncharted desert wasteland - a thousand years before a caravan route was established along the Red Sea - to go to Mecca (which did not even exist prior to the 4th century AD), in order to circumambulate the Quraish pagan's Kaaba (which did not exist prior to the 5th century AD) and black stone idol, to then turn around and wander the 1200 desolate KM back to Zion! Makes perfect sense, doesn't it?

Yet no matter how many times the dissimulation in the Wikipedia article is pointed out, and then corrected, liars for "Allah" censor the germane portion of the Bible verse right back out. So which father might this help confirm Muhammad's "Allah" actually is? This particular dissimulation, far from being the rantings of a lone maniac, was taught by the famous Greek sophist styled entertainer and dissimulator Ahmed Deedat, and his self-proclaimed disciple Zakir Naik as well as the popular self-deluded self-proclaimed "exChristian" Yusuf Estes, in Deedat's wake.

Perhaps an even more common example of Islamic dissimulation is their wishful idea that the "Comforter" - or "parakle-tos" in the Greek - that Jesus said would be sent in His name, was Muhammad! Some comforter!

John 14:26 But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.

Yet no matter how many times the specific undeniable truth of that verse is pointed out to Muhammad's followers, Islam's dissimulators continue unabated, with their wishful "Comforter is Muhammad" foolishness. Vainly pretending that the same Bible verses that expose their lies, instead support their false claims! Anyone that has fooled themselves into believing Islamic dissimulation is uncommon, has but to review the Muslim sites on the Internet and Muslim uploaded youtube videos regarding the Comforter/Paraclete, and consider how many include John 14:26 - that defines who the Comforter/Paraclete is - in their discussion.

Of course not. but they do cite their "messenger" Muhammad's name in prayer, perhaps hundreds of times a day. Even more amazingly, Muhammad's followers are taught that to pray in Jesus' name, would be to commit Muhammad's ONLY UNFORGIVABLE SIN of "shirk". Islam again demonstrating itself to be the perfect opposite of the Gospel:

When Christians pray in Jesus' name He is right there with us, through the Holy Spirit, the Comforter that the Father sent in Yeshua's name. Together Jesus and his people are the temple of God. Obviously not the Quraish pagan's Kaaba, located 1200 kilometers away from THE Holy Land of the prophets and patriarchs. Yet Muhammad's followers insist that Muhammad was the "Comforter", "paraclete", "intercessor", "assistant", "helper", even though the definition of the term "paraklete" suggests that by doing so they commit Muhammad's only unforgivable sin!

Deuteronomy 18:18 I will raise them up a Prophet from among their brethren, like unto thee, and will put my words in his mouth; and he shall speak unto them all that I shall command him. 19 And it shall come to pass, [that] whosoever will not hearken unto my words which he shall speak in my name, I will require [it] of him.

Acts 3:22 For Moses truly said unto the fathers, A prophet shall the Lord your God raise up unto you of your brethren, like unto me; him shall ye hear in all things whatsoever he shall say unto you. 23 And it shall come to pass, [that] every soul, which will not hear that prophet, shall be destroyed from among the people. 24 Yea, and all the prophets from Samuel and those that follow after, as many as have spoken, have likewise foretold of these days. 25 Ye are the children of the prophets, and of the covenant which God made with our fathers, saying unto Abraham, And in thy seed shall all the kindreds of the earth be blessed. 26 Unto you first God, having raised up his Son Jesus, sent him to bless you, in turning away every one of you from his iniquities.

Not only pointing out the easily exposed falsehood of such taqiyyah, but serving as a dire warning to the very people who engage in this dissimulation, who adamantly refuse to "hear that prophet" - Jesus - but instead follow Muhammad alone and thus may be "destroyed from among the people". At least when it comes to Gentiles. We have a whole host of other such subjects on Islamic dissimulation that are explored in a category devoted to "Islam In and On Scripture" in the Islam-Christian Forum.

On average Muslims are the most literate group of people in the world. According to Nicolai Sennels, a Danish psychologist: "In the last 1,200 years of Islam, just 100,000 books have been translated into Arabic, about what Spain does in a single year. Seven out of 10 Turks have never even read a book." Thus many of Muhammad's followers are prone to simply accepting what they are taught, without ever giving a thought, to the plausability of it. Like Muhammad's claim of having ridden around on a flying donkey-mule.

"Abraham took Hagar and her son, Ishmael to a place near the Kabah; he left them under a tree at the site of Zamzam. No one lived in Makkah back then, yet Abraham made them sit there, leaving them with some dates, and a small water-skin. Thereafter he set out towards home."

So Muslims are required to believe that Hagar and Ishmael wandered from Abraham's home in Hebron, to the well of zamzam in Mecca. They are even required to believe that Abraham built or rebuilt the Kaaba (with some believing Adam originally built it). Yet in order for Hagar to have wound up - in the place where Mecca was eventually settled two thousand years after Hagar lived - she would have had to have traveled over 1200 kilometers of harsh, barren, unexplored, uncharted, untravelled waterless desert wasteland, over a thousand years before history informs us the first caravan route was established along the Red Sea.

Genesis 21:14 And Abraham rose up early in the morning, and took bread, and a bottle of water, and gave it unto Hagar, putting it on her shoulder, and the child, and sent her away: and she departed, and wandered in the wilderness of Beersheba.

Please note the location of Beersheba on the preceding map. Islamic so-called "tradition", was all created and put to the pen in the 7th to 10th centuries AD, without reference to any actual historical record from prior to the 5th century AD. Without this created fiction that pretends Abrahamic roots, and masquerades as thousands of years of pre-Muhammad history, Islam is exposed as nothing more than the fraud of a 7th century SW Arabian desert dwelling illiterate false prophet. Stripped naked and exposed as absolutely nothing more, than an imperialistic political machine bent on conquest and subjugation of the world, without even the pretense of religiousity. Except of course to subjugating everyone in the world into an ANTI-religion dedicated to DISbelieving the crucifixion of Christ - the whole subject of the Gospel - and denying the Son of God, as articles of faith in the followers of Muhammad's followers.

So in a desperate effort to keep this scharade afloat, at the following link is a map from a popular Muslim website that even makes an effort to change physical, matter of fact, fixed, geography. Perhaps they think that making bigger arrows will make the distances appear shorter and thus hide the geographical impossibility of Islamic so-called "tradition" regarding Abraham:

We have to pity these poor folks who follow Muhammad alone, trying so desperately to pencil Muhammad into the Scriptures of the one true God YHWH of Jews and Christians, even as Muhammad denied the whole subject of the Gospel. It isn't like false prophets weren't prophesied, perhaps even featuring Muhammad as THE false prophet.

Nor do we have to wonder why the so-called "Palestinians" have never held up their end of a peace agreement with the Israelis. That reason being that no oath between a Muslim and a non-Muslim is binding ......... on the Muslim:

Sahih Muslim 15:4052 Allah's Messenger (may peace he upon him) said: He who took an oath and (later on) found something better than that should do that, and expiate for (breaking) his vow.

So Muslims may dissimulate by suggesting limits on taqiyyah, by first convincing themselves that breaking an oath is not technically lying, perhaps even if breaking it was the intent when the agreement was initially struck as in the case of the "Palestinians". Another example is the temporary, and even 24 hour, "marriage" "contract" for Muslim men - that is mutar or misyar - which offers Muslim men their god granted pass for infidelity, and thereby such arrangements not technically considered to be adultery or cheating on their wives under Muhammad's "Allah".

To our Muslim friends, aren't you increasingly tiring of lying and peddling the half-truths of dissimulation for Muhammad and his stand-alone fake trinity, while running and hiding from the truth of the Son of God, as revealed through hundreds of verses in the 1600 year record of YHWH to mankind? Why not view a few testimonies of some former Muslims that have come to know the love of the one true God YHWH, through a relationship with Jesus Christ? Does it really make sense to you that the ONE true God would condone any kind of lying? Much less such behavior as beheading innocent children and sexual abuse of prisoners.

Does it make sense to you that each and every Christian over the last nearly 2,000 years - such as those whose hearts lead them to become involved in organizations like Mercy Ships and Compassion International - have been condemned to hell forever, for having lived and died in a state of committing Muhammad's only unforgivable sin of "shirk", by confessing that Jesus is the Son of God and praying in Jesus' name?

1John 5:10 He that believeth on the Son of God hath the witness in himself: he that believeth not God hath made him a liar; because he believeth not the record that God gave of his Son.

For folks who doubt that today the world is embroiled in a very real war against truth in part through a war against speech, with the highest stakes in world history, in a poll conducted by Wenzel Strategies on Oct. 22-26, 2012 of U.S. Muslims in the "land of the free":

“Almost half of those Muslims surveyed – an astonishing 46 percent – said they believe those Americans who offer criticism or parodies of Islam should face criminal charges,” said pollster Fritz Wenzel in an analysis of the survey’s results."

“Even more shocking: One in eight respondents said they think those Americans who criticize or parody Islam should face the death penalty, while another nine percent said they were unsure on the question”.

What kind of world will your heirs inherit if you continue to sit back in your easy chair and remain silent? How will your heirs judge your efforts, as they look back after you are gone, and they have been enslaved? The death penalty for blasphemy by statute, is of course perfectly consistent with the death penalty for apostasy by statute, in many Islamic countries today. Which is of course perfectly conformed to the agenda of the father of lies.

Do Christians murder Muhammad's followers all around the world for their blasphemy against the Son of God? The very notion is of course absurd, because the truth of the Gospel of the Son of God, has always been able to defend itself, through the love of God. Indeed Christians are commanded, not only to love our neighbors, but even to love our enemies. That's why Christians are engaged in activities like Mercy Ships, Compassion International, The Salvation Army and Voice of the Martyrs. While the father of lies, the opposer of the God of the Jews and Christians, has always required censorship of truth enforced by murder, slavery and death for "apostates".

From "Sharia: The Threat to America" at this link: "The Muslim Brotherhood’s strategic plan for North America was a closely-held secret until the FBI discovered it during a 2004 raid of a house in Annandale, Virginia. Agents discovered a secret basement containing internal Ikhwan documents, including the strategic plan titled, 'An Explanatory Memorandum: On the General Strategic Goal for the Group.'

The strategic plan was written by a member of the Board of Directors for the Muslim Brotherhood in North America and senior Hamas leader named Mohammed Akram, and was approved by the Brotherhood’s Shura Council and Organizational Conference in 1987.

'The process of settlement is a ‘Civilization-Jihadist Process’ with all the word means. The Ikhwan must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ’sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.'

In other words, the Ikhwan’s strategy for destroying the United States is to get us, specifically our leadership, to do the bidding of the MB for them. The Muslim Brotherhood intends to conduct Civilization Jihad by co-opting our leadership into believing a counterfactual understanding of Islam and the nature of the Muslim Brotherhood, thereby coercing these leaders to enforce the MB narrative on their subordinates."

“Phase Two: Phase of gradual appearance on the public scene and exercising and utilizing various public activities (It greatly succeeded in implementing this stage). It also succeeded in achieving a great deal of its important goals, such as infiltrating various sectors of the Government. Gaining religious institutions and embracing senior scholars. Gaining public support and sympathy. Establishing a shadow government (secret) within the Government.

“Phase Four: Open public confrontation with the Government through exercising the political pressure approach. It is aggressively implementing the above-mentioned approach. Training on the use of weapons domestically and overseas in anticipation of zero-hour. It has noticeable activities in this regard.

Ah the spiritual perfection of a 100% Islamic Sharia State, where 15 girls were sent back into a burning school to their deaths, for the audacity of attempting to escape the flames by emerging from the burning building without wearing head coverings.

"The English-language Saudi Gazette, in a front-page report yesterday quoted witnesses as saying that members of the religious police stopped men who tried to help the girls escape from the building, saying: 'It is sinful to approach them.'"

"A civil defense officer told an Arabic-language newspaper, al-Eqtisadiah, that he saw three members of the religious police 'beating young girls to prevent them from leaving the school because they were not wearing the abaya'."

Sharia perfection where "In some parts of Saudi Arabia, particularly in the south .... the rate of marriage among blood relatives ranges from 55 to 70 percent, among the highest rates in the world, according to the Saudi government." While "Across the Arab world today an average of 45 percent of married couples are related, according to Dr. Nadia Sakati, a pediatrician and senior consultant for the genetics research center at King Faisal Specialist Hospital in Riyadh."

While "This practice, which has been prohibited in the Judeo-Christian tradition since the days of Moses, was sanctioned by Muhammad and has been going on now for 50 generations (1,400 years) in the Muslim world."

Only one-way bridges can be built between the Islamic world and the non-Islamic world. This is of course because Muhammad prohibits his followers from even making friends with non-Muslims, and in particular, Jews and Christians:

And yes, it indicates the same in all English translations, so don't buy into the typical Islamic taqiyyah, that it must be a bad translation. And being "of Christians" is no small matter, when Muslims are expected to believe that each and every Christian over nearly 2,000 years has lived and died in a state of committing Muhammad's only unforgivable sin of "shirk", for confessing that Jesus is the Son of God (as revealed in hundreds of Bible verses) and even praying in Jesus' name. Yet:

Today the Islamized media has been subjugated to self-censorship from using words like "Islamist", and "terror" in conjunction with words like "Islam" and "Muslim", while our national security agencies undergo Chinese Cultural Revolution styled "reeducation" regarding the same, even though Muhammad himself was right up front about Islamic terrorism:

Qur'an Surah 33:26 "Allah took down the People of the Scripture Book. He cast terror into their hearts. Some you slew, and some you made prisoners. And He made you heirs of their lands, their houses, and their goods, giving you a land which you had not traversed before. And Allah has power over all things."

Just as Muhammad's true followers are engaged in, all around much of the world today, as explored on the "Muslim Persecution of Christians" page. With over 21,000 deadly Islamic terror attacks around the world, just since 9-11, and the terrorism of Islamic Jihad explored further on that dedicated page.

(URL) Members of congress like Allen West and Michele Bachmann who express concerns over Muslim Brotherhood Islamist influence within particularly sensitive areas of the U.S. government and administration, are demonized by the Islamized, in a manner reminiscent of the Marxist politician's and Marxist media's vilification of Senator Joseph McCarthy for warning about communists within our government shaping U.S. foreign policy.

This from CNS: "'The OIC has hit on a winning strategy to get Western countries to break away from their commitment to free speech by repackaging blasphemy as hate speech and free speech as the manifestation of ‘intolerance,’" George Washington University professor of public interest law Jonathan Turley warned in a column this week.

'Now I know that some in my country and elsewhere have criticized this meeting and our work with all of you. But I want to make clear that I am proud of this work, and I am proud to be working with every one of you.'"

So much for Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's oath of office to support and defend the Constitution when she instead pays homage to the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, whose logo is a globe cradled by Islam's (the Sabians) crescent moon with the Quraish pagan's Kaaba pictured over it. Their goal the same, as 1400 years of Islam, global domination and subjugation of all people to denying the Son of God and rejecting His crucifixion and thus His sin atoning shed blood.

Anonymous email - "The real reason that we can't have the Ten Commandments in a courthouse is that you cannot post "Thou Shalt Not Steal," "Thou Shalt Not Commit Adultery" and "Thou Shall Not Lie" in a building full of lawyers, judges and politicians - it creates a hostile work environment."

John Adams: " The general principles upon which the Fathers achieved independence were the general principals of Christianity I will avow that I believed and now believe that those general principles of Christianity are as eternal and immutable as the existence and attributes of God."

James McHenry: "To the kindly influence of Christianity we owe that degree of civil freedom, and political and social happiness which mankind now enjoys. . . . Whenever the pillars of Christianity shall be overthrown, our present republican forms of government, and all blessings which flow from them, must fall with them."

Thomas Jefferson: "God who gave us life gave us liberty. And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are a gift from God?"

A once-Christian nation whose leaders today are bowing to, enabling, and even arming the powers of darkness of the spirit of antichrist - the sworn enemies of the free people of the democracy of Israel and foe of the civilized world - while kissing the rings of the Muslim Brotherhood as they conquer America, let alone in much of the rest of the world.

Even as Muhammad's followers are compelled to believe that to confess that Jesus is the Son of God, or even pray in Jesus' name, constitutes the single most "heinous" and only unforgivable sin of "shirk" in Islam. As compared to child rape, or the cold-blooded mass murder of a busload of Jewish schoolchildren, for example, which may be forgiven - or perhaps even commanded in the view of some.

Sahih Muslim B41, #6981 Ibn 'Umar reported Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: You will fight against the jews and you will kill them until even a stone would say: Come here, Muslim, there is a Jew (hiding himself behind me); kill him. (also #6983 #6984 #6985)